Community Centered Process Overview
A community-centered process is a structured approach to investigations, adjudication, or disciplinary proceedings in which the individual or party named in a complaint or inquiry — referred to as the respondent — is afforded a meaningful opportunity to participate in and shape the outcome. Under this framework, the respondent is notified of the allegations or concerns raised against them, provided access to relevant information and documentation, and given a reasonable opportunity to submit a response, present evidence, and offer their perspective before any determination or decision is made.
This approach is grounded in principles of procedural fairness and due process, ensuring that outcomes are reached only after all relevant parties have been heard. A respondent-driven process does not pre-determine findings; rather, it treats the respondent as an active participant whose input is a necessary and valued component of a thorough and impartial review. It is important to note that our community-centered process is not adversarial in nature and is not structured as a contest between the complainants and the respondent.
Respondents
Respondents are presumed not to have violated policy during the disciplinary process unless responsibility is established by a preponderance of the evidence, which indicates that a respondent more likely than not committed a policy violation. Respondents have the right to, (and are strongly encouraged to seek) counseling and support available through resources such as CAPS, Duke Reach, or other University and local resources. Respondents may request trained advising by contacting OSCCS. If a Respondent chooses not to receive trained advising through OSCCS, they may seek advice from any University community member (a current Duke student, staff, or faculty member). OSCCS conducts annual advising training for students and university staff to support respondents throughout the academic year by providing clear guidance on disciplinary and non-disciplinary proceedings, assisting with preparation strategies, and discussing potential outcomes, while maintaining neutrality. These trained individuals neither advocate for specific outcomes nor participate actively in the conduct process.
OSCCS or their designee will inform the respondent of the University’s disciplinary process and possible outcomes during their proceeding. OSCCS will communicate substantive and, when warranted, procedural developments regarding an investigation. Please note that alleged behavior may also be criminal in nature, and a respondent may be subject to a criminal investigation by the appropriate law enforcement agency at the same time as an investigation by the University under this policy. If this occurs, the respondent may wish to consult with a criminal lawyer, as OSCCS does not provide advice on the criminal process.
Witnesses
Witnesses will be treated with respect before, during, and after the disciplinary process. A witness may provide relevant information and share their experience. The alleged conduct may also be criminal in nature, and witnesses have the right to report and participate —or not to report—the conduct to Duke Police, Durham Police, or other appropriate law enforcement agencies. A criminal report does not preclude University disciplinary action.
OSCCS conducts proceedings in a manner that is as harmonious as possible, emphasizing accountability within a restorative framework that upholds the dignity, honesty, and holistic development of all students involved.